<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Gemal&apos;s Psyched Blog - Comments on Mozilla and Coverity</title>
		<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/index.html</link>
		<description>Some of you might have noticed that on some of the checkins that are made recently the word coverity has been mentioned. Coverity is a bug finding system that is capable of detecting defects and security vulnerabilities in the source...</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:48:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:31:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.17</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>By Matthew Wilson</title>
				<description>Are those links really correct?</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are those links really correct?</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment1?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment1</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 12:54:49 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Matthew Wilson</name>
					<email>matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Robin</title>
				<description>Matthew - &apos;coverity&apos; is a keyword so you can easily search in Bugzilla for these bugs.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew - 'coverity' is a keyword so you can easily search in Bugzilla for these bugs.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment2?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment2</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 14:35:15 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Robin</name>
					<email>robin@reala.net</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Jon Smirl</title>
				<description>If you log into the Coverity system there are 528 outstanding problems. Some of the difference is caused by problems marked as fixed, but the fix hasn&apos;t yet made it through Bugzilla, CVS and back to Coverity for verification. Last time I looked mozilla/security had the highest number of hits with about 1/3 of them.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you log into the Coverity system there are 528 outstanding problems. Some of the difference is caused by problems marked as fixed, but the fix hasn't yet made it through Bugzilla, CVS and back to Coverity for verification. Last time I looked mozilla/security had the highest number of hits with about 1/3 of them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment3?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment3</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 16:58:24 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Jon Smirl</name>
					<email>jonsmirl@gmail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By alanjstr</title>
				<description>A big congrats to Coverity for finding all these bugs as well as the people fixing them.  And while there are some Invalid, Duplicate, and Wontfix, this is a *good thing*.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big congrats to Coverity for finding all these bugs as well as the people fixing them.  And while there are some Invalid, Duplicate, and Wontfix, this is a *good thing*.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment4?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment4</guid>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 07:38:22 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>alanjstr</name>
					<email>umo-alanjstrMail@sneakemail.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Steve</title>
				<description>Most (all?) of the Coverity bugs fixed didn&apos;t make it into the 1.8.0.4 branch due to release timing.  When will they be seen in a released code base?  1.8.1?  1.8.0.5?</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most (all?) of the Coverity bugs fixed didn't make it into the 1.8.0.4 branch due to release timing.  When will they be seen in a released code base?  1.8.1?  1.8.0.5?<br />
</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment5?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2006/05/18/mozilla_and_coverity/#comment5</guid>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:28:59 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Steve</name>
					<email>nobody@spamcop.net</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
