<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Gemal&apos;s Psyched Blog - Comments on Mozilla Foundation non-profit no more?</title>
		<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/index.html</link>
		<description>According to Techcrunch Mozilla Foundation is being audited by the IRS and its non-profit status is in question: On the audit of the Foundation there has not been any formal notification of issues. There has been inquiry regarding its tax...</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:48:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:30:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.17</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>By Mike Beltzner</title>
				<description>Henrik, the TechCrunch article is misleading, misinformed, and misreading the statements. These are the facts:The Mozilla Corporation is not registered as a non-profit entity, pays taxes, receives revenues, etc.The Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit organization, and its status is not under question.Google does not provide funds to Mozilla as &quot;charity&quot;; it&apos;s a negotiated revenue deal, and they make more money off of the traffic generated than they pay to Mozilla. It&apos;s easy to forget that, but this is not a charity issue; it&apos;s an &quot;affinity&quot; revenue sharing deal.I would appreciate it if you updated your summary to reflect the fact that you&apos;re linking to an article rife with inaccuracies.</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henrik, the TechCrunch article is misleading, misinformed, and misreading the statements. These are the facts:</p>

<p>The Mozilla Corporation is not registered as a non-profit entity, pays taxes, receives revenues, etc.</p>

<p>The Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit organization, and its status is not under question.</p>

<p>Google does not provide funds to Mozilla as "charity"; it's a negotiated revenue deal, and they make more money off of the traffic generated than they pay to Mozilla. It's easy to forget that, but this is not a charity issue; it's an "affinity" revenue sharing deal.</p>

<p>I would appreciate it if you updated your summary to reflect the fact that you're linking to an article rife with inaccuracies.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/#comment1?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/#comment1</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:55:17 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Mike Beltzner</name>
					<email>beltzner@mozilla.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>By Simon</title>
				<description>So, sounds like the writer might be confusing Corporation and Foundation?</description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, sounds like the writer might be confusing Corporation and Foundation?</p>]]></content:encoded>
				<link>http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/#comment2?from=rss-comment</link>
				<guid>http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/#comment2</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:27:06 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>
					<name>Simon</name>
					<email>delgarde@yahoo.com</email>
				</author>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
